PASU Comment Period Deadline Draws Near

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) has released Proposed Accounting Standards Update (“PASU”) (Revised), a revision of the 2010 proposed FASB Accounting Standards Update, Leases (Topic 840). The guidance in this PASU was developed through a joint project with the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”), which has also released a similar Exposure Draft. Currently, United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles require leases to be classified as either capital or operating, based on established criteria.  Capital leases require the lessee to book an asset and corresponding liability equal to the net present value of future lease payments associated with the lease agreement. The asset is generally required to be amortized over the shorter of the asset’s useful life or the term of the lease, and as payments are made, a portion is allocated to reduce the liability and a portion is recognized as interest expense. If classified as an operating lease, no asset is booked and lease payments are expensed as incurred. The guidance in this PASU affects both lessors and lessees.
Key provisions of the proposed guidance for leases, from a lessee’s perspective, are as follows:

1.  For leases with a maximum possible term of more than 12 months, a lessee would be required to recognize an asset and liability. The lessee would recognize a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the leased asset (the underlying asset) for the lease term. The underlying asset is defined as an asset that is the subject of a lease for which a right to use that asset has been conveyed to a lessee. The underlying asset could be a physically distinct portion of a single asset.

2.  The subsequent accounting for the lease will be based on its classification as either a Type A or a Type B lease. The classification as Type A or B is based on the nature of the leased asset, as follows:

  • If the underlying asset is not property (defined as land or a building, or part of a building, or both), a lessee would classify the lease as a Type A lease. However, if the lease term is for an insignificant part of the total economic life of the underlying asset (discussed later in this summary) or the present value of the lease payments is insignificant relative to the fair value of the underlying asset at the commencement date (defined as the date on which a lessor makes an underlying asset available for use by a lessee), it would be classified as a Type B Lease. If the lease is determined to be a Type A lease, a lessee would:
    • Recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, initially measured at the present value of lease payments.
    • Recognize the unwinding of the discount on the lease liability as interest separately from the amortization of the right-of-use asset which is to be amortized on a straight-line basis, unless another systematic basis is more representative of the pattern in which the lessee expects to consume the right-of-use asset’s future economic benefit (the accelerated method).
  • If the underlying asset is property, a lessee would classify the lease as a Type B lease. However, if the term of the lease is for the major part of the remaining economic life of the underlying asset or the present value of the lease payments account for substantially all of the fair value of the underlying asset at the commencement date, it would be classified as a Type A Lease. If the lease is determined to be a Type B Lease, a lessee would:
    • Recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, initially measured at the present value of lease payments.
    • Recognize a single lease cost, combining the unwinding of the discount on the lease liability with the amortization of the right-of-use asset, on a straight-line basis.

3.  This PASU does not specifically define the insignificant portion of the economic life or economic benefit embedded in the underlying asset, but it does provide certain examples in the background section, such as: If a lessee leases a car for three years and that car has an economic life of seven years, the lessee would be expected to consume more than an insignificant portion of the economic benefits embedded in the underlying asset. Alternatively, a lessee leases two floors of an office building for two years and that building has an economic life of 50 years, the lessee is consuming an insignificant portion of the economic benefits embedded in the underlying asset.

4.  When measuring assets and liabilities arising from a lease, a lessee would exclude most variable lease payments (defined as payments made by a lessee to a lessor for the right to use an underlying asset that vary because of changes in facts or circumstances occurring after the commencement date, other than the passage of time). In addition, a lessee and a lessor would include payments to be made in optional periods only if the lessee has a significant economic incentive to extend the lease or terminate the lease.

5.  For leases with a maximum possible term (including any options to extend) of 12 months or less, a lessee would be permitted to make an accounting policy election, by class of underlying asset, to apply simplified requirements which would be similar to existing operating lease accounting.

6.  An entity would be required to provide expanded disclosures to meet the objective of enabling users of financial statements to understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases.

The comment period for this PASU ends September 13, 2013. 
From the date the proposed guidance becomes effective, lessees are to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach. A full retrospective approach would require a lessee to calculate the carrying amounts of all outstanding leases individually at the date of transition as if those leases had always been accounted for in accordance with the proposed guidance. With the modified retrospective approach, a lessee would calculate lease assets and liabilities in a manner similar to the full retrospective approach, but the lessee would be allowed to use information available at the date of transition and would be able to calculate a discount rate on a portfolio basis for leases with similar characteristics, rather than calculate a specific discount rate for each individual lease. An effective date has yet to be established.

To discuss the information above, please contact the experts listed below at PYA, (800) 270-9629.


Doug Arnold

Doug Arnold

Principal

Matt Neilson

Matt Neilson

Director of Financial Reporting

Related Posts
Are you feeling unease about the impending Tuesday, April 17 tax filing deadline? Fear not –the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) permits a taxpayer to file an extension to allow time...
Read More

The Tax Deadline Looms: Need More Time?

Businesses are increasingly reliant on technology to achieve organizational objectives. However, with the convenience and efficiency of technology come intensifying risks of data loss and theft. High-profile data breaches top...
Read More

Cybersecurity Framework “SOCs” It to Cyber Threats

The ink on the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), which swept in a tidal wave of changes to federal tax rules, had been dry for only seven weeks before...
Read More

New Budget Agreement Brings Additional Tax Changes

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has set forth amended guidance aimed at simplifying and reclassifying certain features of financial instruments. Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2017-11 – Earnings Per...
Read More

The Update on Down Round—FASB Reclassifies Earnings Per Share

The new Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is bringing sweeping reform to the United States tax code. While recent tax reform has drawn considerable media attention to domestic corporate tax...
Read More

The Bottom Line: How Will Recent Tax Reform Impact You?

Most Americans are now aware that new tax reform legislation, titled the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, was signed into law late last year. There has been significant news...
Read More

Excess Employee Compensation Under the New Tax Reform Law: Will Your Tax-Exempt Organization Be Affected?

PYA is pleased to announce the promotions of Michael Ramey, Matt Stuart, and Jeff Pate to the level of Equity Principal. PYA has announced the promotion of Senior Manager Michael...
Read More

PYA Announces Three New Equity Principals

In today’s business environment, cloud computing arrangements play a key role in the day-to-day operations of companies large and small. The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) Accounting Standards Update (ASU)...
Read More

Clearing Up Cloud Computing Accounting

An on-demand webinar, presented by Mike Shamblin, CPA, and brought to you by PYA, helps lay the foundation for the new revenue recognition standard.  The webinar guides healthcare providers of...
Read More

PYA On-Demand Webinar Outlines the New Revenue Recognition Standard in Preparation for Implementation

Share This Insight

If you received value from this article, please share it with your network (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn). Icons below for your convenience.

Stay Current

* indicates required
Monthly eNewsletters
See more newsletter and alert options.

PYA Population Health Ascend

PYA Healthcare Blog

PYA Thought Leadership Services

The Healthcare Loop