Key Considerations for Reevaluating Your Defined Contribution Plans in 2017

defined contribution plansFor employers sponsoring defined contribution retirement plans for employees, the beginning of a new year might be a good time to reevaluate those plans.  Many retirement plans were instated years ago and haven’t been looked at since, meaning that employers and employees alike might not be getting the full benefit of such plans.

Excessive and Hidden Fees

Within the past year, numerous defined contribution (DC) retirement plans have come under fire for excessive investment management fees.  Employers hire investment managers to ensure the plan’s investment options have the highest return for participants, as well as to offer a diverse group of funds from which the participants can choose.  Sometimes, these investment managers can steer plan participants into particular investment fund options.  Essentially, the more investment fund options the employer allows, the higher some of the fees associated with these funds can be.  Such fees often are used for compensating the investment managers appointed to these plans.  The Department of Labor has tried to eliminate these higher fees by adopting a “conflict of interest final rule” to be implemented April 10, 2017.  This final rule will help protect employees participating in DC retirement plans by ensuring that “firms and advisors will be required to make prudent investment recommendations without regard to their own interest, or the interests of those other than the customer, charge only reasonable compensation, and make no misrepresentations to their customers regarding recommended investments.”

Another issue with retirement plan fees is that these fees can be “hidden” among certain investment fund options.  For example, suppose that Employee A invests in Option 1 and Employee B invests in Option 2.  Option 1 has a fee higher than Option 2, but Option 1 gives a fee credit to the entire plan at the end of the year, which is then allocated to the accounts of both Employee A and Employee B.  Employee A’s fee essentially has reduced Employee B’s fee.  Multiple lawsuits have been filed due to these excessive, and sometimes hidden, fees, which are seen as unfair to those paying the higher fees.  Employers should take a closer look at plan fee agreements to ensure their plan’s fees are fair for participants.

Millennials and Retirement

Millennials currently make up the largest generation in the U.S. workforce. However, countless millennials don’t save enough for retirement.  According to a survey from Natixis Global Asset Management (Natixis), only 55% of millennials believe they can count on Social Security benefits when they retire.  This lack of confidence in the Social Security program is a major reason millennials are turning to employer-sponsored retirement programs.  The Natixis survey also showed that 82% of millennials believe that employers should be required to offer some kind of retirement plan to their employees.  For a number of millennials, saving money is a great difficulty.  Exorbitant student loan debt is a major obstacle for some, but others cite lack of education and guidance around retirement plans as a deterrent.  Employers should examine the demographics of their workforce and try to offer educational guidance for workers at every stage of employment, from newly enrolled to nearing retirement.  This may help all employees create a clearer financial picture of their future.

Plan Documents

As more and more employees participate in these DC retirement plans, it might be advantageous for employers to refer to the plan document to review the plan’s original purpose. Questions to ask might include:

  • Were they trying to gain greater employee participation in the program?
  • Did they hope to incur the least expensive retirement program?
  • Were they trying to be competitive with other employer retirement programs by offering the most diverse investment options?
  • Did they consider the retirement program from the perspective of their employees?

To understand where focus should be directed while evaluating a retirement plan, these are important questions to ask.  Employers should review their program’s rules surrounding automatic enrollment of employees to assess the impact of this provision on their program.

In addition, employers should review fund options to determine if they are diverse enough for their employees, as well as review the matching contribution their retirement program offers to determine if they can increase it by 1-2%.  Employees are more likely to participate if they see their money going further.  Increases in the stock market play a large role in this, but employers have multiple ways to entice participation without relying on market performance.

The Role of Third-Party Administrators

Finally, employers should ensure they are getting everything they need from their third-party administrator (TPA).  Employers should retain all TPA agreements and periodically review them to determine if they lack services the TPA should be providing.  For example, many TPAs should provide certain reports, such as quarterly plan sponsor reports, as well as the annual Summary Plan Description (SPD) for distribution to all retirement program participants.  Frequently, a TPA fails to provide an employer with quarterly reports or an SPD, so the employer produces its own quarterly reports and annual documents to distribute.

Additionally, employers should evaluate whether their retirement program fees are fair.  Almost all TPA agreements include a fee schedule outlining what the employer is required to pay regarding general recordkeeping services and what the employees are required to pay regarding individual participant-directed transactions.  Employers should not be afraid to “shop around” for different administrators and record-keepers to compare services and associated costs.  Employers also should be sure they have a point of contact to approach when they or their employees have questions regarding the retirement program.  Most TPAs have an account manager assigned to a specific retirement program.  Employers must ensure they receive support from this account manager on a regular basis, and not just at the end of the year during an audit.

As the seasons change, so will the needs of employers and employees.  Ringing in a new year almost always signals a fresh start, and employers should take note.  Employees will be reevaluating their individual portfolios, and employers should be ahead of the game to offer the best retirement program possible.

If you have any questions about defined contribution plans, or would like to request a speaker on this topic for your organization or event, contact one of our executives below at (800) 270-9629.

Mike Shamblin

Mike Shamblin

Managing Principal of Audit & Assurance Services

Catherine Bunch

Catherine Bunch


Related Posts
Several PYA employees were acknowledged for their achievements in mid-year promotions.   PYA, a professional services firm, has announced that Matt Neilson is the latest principal to join its executive team.  In addition,...
Read More

PYA Announces Several Mid-Year Promotions

In the nonprofit world, organizations are fueled and sustained by generous contributions and grants, which are used to support the organization’s mission.  Although such funding can often be the deciding...
Read More

“Threading the Needle”—Accounting Standards Update Closes Hole in Nonprofit Grant Guidance

Certain employees of governmental and not-for-profit organizations may qualify for a program that offers student loan forgiveness with zero tax liability.   The Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) Program gives full-time...
Read More

Tax-Free Student Loan Forgiveness for Eligible Public Servants

PYA, a national professional services firm headquartered in Knoxville, has been awarded a 2018 Top Workplaces honor by the Knoxville News Sentinel. The award is a result of employee feedback...
Read More

Knoxville News Sentinel Names PYA a Winner of the Greater Knoxville Area 2018 Top Workplaces Award

The new Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) can be confusing for many-- especially small business owners.  Although many aspects of the TCJA have been discussed, one component of the...
Read More

Government Clamps Down on “Deductible Fun” for Businesses

As businesses consider the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) introduced late last year, the corporate tax rate is receiving substantial attention.  However, according to a 2014...
Read More

2018 Tax Reform – The Excess Loss Limitation Likely to Squeeze Owners of Cyclical Businesses

A recent Accounting Standards Update (ASU) addresses land easements and their accounting under the new lease standards.  In January 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2018-01 Leases:...
Read More

Land Easements—Guidance for Implementing New Lease Accounting Standards

Many Americans have a 401(k) retirement savings plan as a benefit of employment with their employers.  They contribute a percentage of their compensation to their 401(k) each pay period with...
Read More

Taking Distributions from Your 401(k): What You Need to Know

Stakeholders seeking clarity were behind the latest Accounting Standards Update (ASU) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB).  In response to questions raised, the FASB released ASU 2018-03: Technical...
Read More

Measuring Fair Value: New ASU Offers Clarity

Share This Insight

If you received value from this article, please share it with your network (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn). Icons below for your convenience.

Stay Current

* indicates required
Monthly eNewsletters
See more newsletter and alert options.

PYA Population Health Ascend

PYA Healthcare Blog

PYA Thought Leadership Services

The Healthcare Loop