Compliance Risk Assessments: The Foundation of Effective Compliance Programs

compliance risk assessmentsAs compliance regulations and laws evolve and increase in number, many organizations – hospitals, home health agencies, skilled nursing facilities, physician practices, and third-party medical billing companies, among others – are constantly exposed to new compliance risks.  To adapt to this ever-changing environment, it is necessary to determine the levels of risk present throughout an organization.  Conducting thorough compliance risk assessments on a regular basis will identify and evaluate these risks, and will empower an organization’s leadership to address any necessary changes.

Compliance risks emerge from violations (intentional or unintentional) of regulations, laws, codes of conduct, or standards of practice.  To understand these threats, organizations must assess their level of risk and exposure to potential damage.

Compliance risk assessments are a vital part of an effective compliance program.  They should be performed regularly to support the development and implementation of a compliance work plan.  These assessments can be performed manually, or with the assistance of specialty software, and can be accomplished by an internal self-assessment paired with an external assessment by a third party every two to three years.

However, if an organization has been sanctioned by a government entity for an inappropriate process or other violation, the government entity may mandate that an annual compliance risk assessment be performed by an external group as part of a corporate integrity agreement or non-prosecutorial agreement.  External third-party-based risk assessments obtain a truly unbiased assessment.

Healthcare providers and organizations that receive payment from federal payers are required by the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) to have a compliance program in place.  The risk assessment examines compliance issues that organizations must mitigate to address potential financial and operational loss.

Compliance risk often involves:

  • Exposure to regulatory and legal penalties.
  • Payment refunds.
  • Material losses from failure to demonstrate compliance.
  • Potential damage to an organization’s public reputation.

Organizations must understand the details of their risk universe.  Fortunately, the OIG has established guidelines for hospitals, physician practices, pharmaceutical manufacturers, clinical laboratories, third-party billing companies, and other healthcare organizations to follow.  Healthcare regulatory compliance is a constantly moving target.  Payers issue new documentation, coding, and billing requirements often – frequently without any apparent notification.  It is necessary for healthcare organizations to remain current with all new and updated regulations.  Compliance violations can arise from misunderstood or improperly implemented regulations.  Keep in mind that as far as the government is concerned, a violation is a violation, regardless of intent.

A compliance risk assessment is critical for focusing important organizational resources on addressing the greatest risks and/or those areas lacking controls.  Unfortunately, particularly when limited resources are a factor, management of regulatory compliance within healthcare organizations is often considered to be of secondary importance, exposing the organization to unnecessary risk.  Compliance risk assessments enable organizations to appropriately and efficiently allocate resources to make sure that important compliance issues are not overlooked.

Compliance risk assessments are a great way to “take the temperature” of an organization by uncovering vulnerabilities, such as duplication of efforts, process issues, and lack of communication.  For instance, there are many rules to follow in order to correctly bill and submit claims.  It is important to establish good processes and open communications between the clinical and financial departments so that correct information is shared appropriately.  These key processes cannot be accomplished in silos – a multidisciplinary, coordinated effort is required.

Specific steps for completing a compliance risk assessment include:

  • Determining the risk universe by assessing operational areas and responsible parties.
  • Determining if the assessment should be under attorney-client privilege to protect issues that must be addressed.
  • Implementing a robust methodology for determining areas of risk.
  • Gathering and reviewing related policies, procedures, audits, investigative reports, and similar documentation.
  • Interviewing key individuals (e.g., service line leaders, compliance department leaders and staff, executives, medical staff, and the governing board) who are responsible for compliance function oversight.
  • Utilizing questionnaires to determine whether compliance controls are in place and followed.
  • Compiling the resulting information and applying risk factors, weighted by rank of importance, regarding which risks require the most immediate corrective action.
  • Identifying the parties responsible for compliance.
  • Formalizing a plan of action based on the levels of identified risk, factoring in the organization’s risk appetite.
  • Internally disseminating the assessment report so that its recommendations can be reviewed and applied to day-to-day operations throughout the organization.
  • Providing affected employees and new employees updates and continuing education regarding risk issues through seminars, leadership meetings, and/or internal correspondence.

The main focus of the assessment should be to examine specific areas of risk that pose the greatest threat, resulting in the creation of a compliance work plan, which spells out the strategy for compliance for the following year.  An organization uses the compliance work plan to implement the findings and recommendations of the assessment into its day-to-day operations.

It is extremely important to communicate the assessment findings and any recommended corrective actions to the organization’s executive leaders and governance board, as the OIG holds them ultimately responsible for attaining compliance.  Of note, the Department of Justice stipulates that individuals can be held responsible for non-compliance and corporate wrongdoing.

Key Takeaways:

  • A compliance program should include thorough compliance risk assessments that are performed regularly.
  • An organization should break down silos to cover all areas of an organization to complete a thorough assessment.
  • An organization should be prepared to continually address new risks as they arise.

If you would like more information about compliance risk assessments, or would like to request a speaker on this topic for your organization or event, contact one of our related PYA executives below at (800) 270-9629.

Related guidance:

 


Susan Thomas

Susan Thomas

Manager

Shannon Sumner

Shannon Sumner

Principal

Related Posts
PYA is pleased to announce the promotions of Michael Ramey, Matt Stuart, and Jeff Pate to the level of Equity Principal. PYA has announced the promotion of Senior Manager Michael...
Read More

PYA Announces Three New Equity Principals

PYA Principal Bob Paskowski is charting risk-contracting territory in an article published in the December issue of hfm Magazine, a publication of the Healthcare Financial Management Association (HFMA). Included in...
Read More

Charting Success: Key Risk-Contracting Provisions

PYA Healthcare Consulting Manager Kathryn Culver authored an article, “Changing Landscape for Health Lawyers,” which was recently published in Connections magazine, a monthly publication of the American Health Lawyers Association...
Read More

“Changing Landscape for Health Lawyers”

A Section 83(b) election could be one of the biggest tax-saving decisions for taxpayers who receive equity subject to vesting. It is common for start-up founders and key employees to...
Read More

83(b) Election for Start-Up Founders

A recent article in DecisionHealth’s Part B News provides a glimpse into the future of charting patient encounters and the changes that will occur regarding Evaluation and Management (E/M) documentation....
Read More

PYA Thought Leader Quoted in Article Highlighting Potential Changes to E/M Documentation and Reporting

PYA made significant contributions to the recently released “BVR/AHLA Guide to Valuing Physician Compensation and Healthcare Service Arrangements,” which serves as the definitive guide for healthcare organizations seeking to understand...
Read More

PYA Lends Expertise in Premier Industry Publication for Valuing Physician Compensation and Healthcare Service Arrangements

An on-demand webinar, presented by Mike Shamblin, CPA, and brought to you by PYA, helps lay the foundation for the new revenue recognition standard.  The webinar guides healthcare providers of...
Read More

PYA On-Demand Webinar Outlines the New Revenue Recognition Standard in Preparation for Implementation

Gaining a deeper understanding of the legalities associated with academic medical centers (AMCs) and other teaching hospitals will be the focus this winter at the American Health Lawyers Association (AHLA)...
Read More

PYA Supports AHLA Programming for AMCs and Teaching Hospitals

PYA Senior Manager Valerie Rock authored an article, “New Payment Review Strategies: What to Do If You Receive an Outlier Coding Notice,” which was recently published in Medical Economics magazine....
Read More

“New Payment Review Strategies: What to Do If You Receive an Outlier Coding Notice”

Share This Insight

If you received value from this article, please share it with your network (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn). Icons below for your convenience.

Stay Current

* indicates required
Monthly eNewsletters
See more newsletter and alert options.

PYA Population Health Ascend

PYA Healthcare Blog

PYA Thought Leadership Services

The Healthcare Loop