Compliance Risk Assessments: The Foundation of Effective Compliance Programs

compliance risk assessmentsAs compliance regulations and laws evolve and increase in number, many organizations – hospitals, home health agencies, skilled nursing facilities, physician practices, and third-party medical billing companies, among others – are constantly exposed to new compliance risks.  To adapt to this ever-changing environment, it is necessary to determine the levels of risk present throughout an organization.  Conducting thorough compliance risk assessments on a regular basis will identify and evaluate these risks, and will empower an organization’s leadership to address any necessary changes.

Compliance risks emerge from violations (intentional or unintentional) of regulations, laws, codes of conduct, or standards of practice.  To understand these threats, organizations must assess their level of risk and exposure to potential damage.

Compliance risk assessments are a vital part of an effective compliance program.  They should be performed regularly to support the development and implementation of a compliance work plan.  These assessments can be performed manually, or with the assistance of specialty software, and can be accomplished by an internal self-assessment paired with an external assessment by a third party every two to three years.

However, if an organization has been sanctioned by a government entity for an inappropriate process or other violation, the government entity may mandate that an annual compliance risk assessment be performed by an external group as part of a corporate integrity agreement or non-prosecutorial agreement.  External third-party-based risk assessments obtain a truly unbiased assessment.

Healthcare providers and organizations that receive payment from federal payers are required by the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) to have a compliance program in place.  The risk assessment examines compliance issues that organizations must mitigate to address potential financial and operational loss.

Compliance risk often involves:

  • Exposure to regulatory and legal penalties.
  • Payment refunds.
  • Material losses from failure to demonstrate compliance.
  • Potential damage to an organization’s public reputation.

Organizations must understand the details of their risk universe.  Fortunately, the OIG has established guidelines for hospitals, physician practices, pharmaceutical manufacturers, clinical laboratories, third-party billing companies, and other healthcare organizations to follow.  Healthcare regulatory compliance is a constantly moving target.  Payers issue new documentation, coding, and billing requirements often – frequently without any apparent notification.  It is necessary for healthcare organizations to remain current with all new and updated regulations.  Compliance violations can arise from misunderstood or improperly implemented regulations.  Keep in mind that as far as the government is concerned, a violation is a violation, regardless of intent.

A compliance risk assessment is critical for focusing important organizational resources on addressing the greatest risks and/or those areas lacking controls.  Unfortunately, particularly when limited resources are a factor, management of regulatory compliance within healthcare organizations is often considered to be of secondary importance, exposing the organization to unnecessary risk.  Compliance risk assessments enable organizations to appropriately and efficiently allocate resources to make sure that important compliance issues are not overlooked.

Compliance risk assessments are a great way to “take the temperature” of an organization by uncovering vulnerabilities, such as duplication of efforts, process issues, and lack of communication.  For instance, there are many rules to follow in order to correctly bill and submit claims.  It is important to establish good processes and open communications between the clinical and financial departments so that correct information is shared appropriately.  These key processes cannot be accomplished in silos – a multidisciplinary, coordinated effort is required.

Specific steps for completing a compliance risk assessment include:

  • Determining the risk universe by assessing operational areas and responsible parties.
  • Determining if the assessment should be under attorney-client privilege to protect issues that must be addressed.
  • Implementing a robust methodology for determining areas of risk.
  • Gathering and reviewing related policies, procedures, audits, investigative reports, and similar documentation.
  • Interviewing key individuals (e.g., service line leaders, compliance department leaders and staff, executives, medical staff, and the governing board) who are responsible for compliance function oversight.
  • Utilizing questionnaires to determine whether compliance controls are in place and followed.
  • Compiling the resulting information and applying risk factors, weighted by rank of importance, regarding which risks require the most immediate corrective action.
  • Identifying the parties responsible for compliance.
  • Formalizing a plan of action based on the levels of identified risk, factoring in the organization’s risk appetite.
  • Internally disseminating the assessment report so that its recommendations can be reviewed and applied to day-to-day operations throughout the organization.
  • Providing affected employees and new employees updates and continuing education regarding risk issues through seminars, leadership meetings, and/or internal correspondence.

The main focus of the assessment should be to examine specific areas of risk that pose the greatest threat, resulting in the creation of a compliance work plan, which spells out the strategy for compliance for the following year.  An organization uses the compliance work plan to implement the findings and recommendations of the assessment into its day-to-day operations.

It is extremely important to communicate the assessment findings and any recommended corrective actions to the organization’s executive leaders and governance board, as the OIG holds them ultimately responsible for attaining compliance.  Of note, the Department of Justice stipulates that individuals can be held responsible for non-compliance and corporate wrongdoing.

Key Takeaways:

  • A compliance program should include thorough compliance risk assessments that are performed regularly.
  • An organization should break down silos to cover all areas of an organization to complete a thorough assessment.
  • An organization should be prepared to continually address new risks as they arise.

If you would like more information about compliance risk assessments, or would like to request a speaker on this topic for your organization or event, contact one of our related PYA executives below at (800) 270-9629.

Related guidance:


Susan Thomas

Susan Thomas


Shannon Sumner

Shannon Sumner


Related Posts
Guidance on accounting for share-based payment awards is clear...unless it isn't. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) offered advisement on this very topic in its Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), Compensation—Stock...
Read More

Share-Based Payment Awards: An Update on Modification Accounting

PYA Principal Martie Ross and Consulting Senior Manager Graham Fox were recently featured in an article, “Catching Up on Your MIPS Strategy” published by the Healthcare Financial Management Association (HFMA)....
Read More

PYA Thought Leaders Featured in MIPS Strategy Article

The growing popularity of companies like Airbnb and Vacation Rentals By Owner (VRBO), has many Americans considering renting out their homes, or even specific rooms in their homes,  in hopes...
Read More

Tax Rules to Know When Renting Your Home

Securing fidelity bond coverage as part of your retirement plan is a step in the right direction toward safeguarding your business from mishandled funds, mismanagement, and abuse. Further, it is...
Read More

The Importance of Fidelity Bond Coverage in Your Retirement Plan

PYA was ranked highly for female percentage ownership among the 100 largest accounting firms in the U.S. by Inside Public Accounting. PYA, a national management consulting and accounting firm, has...
Read More

PYA One of the Highest Female Percentage Ownership Among Top 100 U.S. Accounting Firms

PYA is ranked by Modern Healthcare as the nation’s 15th largest healthcare management consulting firm. PYA, a healthcare management consulting firm, is among the nation’s Top 15 largest healthcare management...
Read More

Modern Healthcare Ranks PYA Top 15 Healthcare Consulting Firm

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently reported the first revocation of a hospital’s tax-exempt status under the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 501(r) requirements of the Affordable Care Act (ACA)....
Read More

Tax-Exempt Status Revoked: Is Your Hospital’s Tax-Exempt Status Safe?

Public and private companies can expect improvements to hedge accounting, as it is becoming more transparent for financial statement users.  With the issuance of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2017-12,...
Read More

Hedge Accounting: Simplified Reporting, Other Improvements

With more than 15.5 million people in the U.S. signed up for high-deductible health plans, growing patient financial responsibility is leading to higher consumer sensitivity relating to healthcare costs.  In...
Read More

Strengthening Your Consumer-Based Platform: Affordability

Share This Insight

If you received value from this article, please share it with your network (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn). Icons below for your convenience.

Stay Current

See more newsletter and alert options.

PYA Population Health Ascend

PYA Healthcare Blog

PYA Thought Leadership Services

The Healthcare Loop